Randomised controlled trial to compare efficacy of standard care alone and in combination with homoeopathic treatment of moderate/severe COVID-19 cases.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: No definite treatment is known for COVID-19 till date. The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of customized Homoeopathic medicines, when used as an add-on treatment to Standard of Care (SOC), in patients suffering from moderate to severe COVID-19 infection. METHODS: This was a randomized, controlled, single-blind, parallel-group trial where 214 COVID19-positive patients were screened for moderate and severe cases of COVID-19. Adjuvant homoeopathic medicines were given in the treatment group and SOC was given to both groups. The duration of oxygen support was compared as the primary outcome. Subjects were followed for 28 days or till the end-point of mechanical ventilation/ death. RESULTS: Of 129 subjects included, 57 and 55 were severe; and 8 and 9 were moderate cases in Homoeopathy and SOC arms, respectively. In all, 9 (15.2%) participants in Homoeopathy and 20 (32.2%) participants in SOC arms eventually expired (p<0.05). Oxygen support was required for 9.84±7.00 and 14.92±7.549 days in Homoeopathy and SOC arms, respectively (p<0.005). Subjects receiving Homoeopathy (12.9±6.days) had a shorter hospitalization stay than in SOC (14.9±7.5 days). Homoeopathy arm (10.6±5.7 days) also showed statistically significant mean conversion time of of Realtime-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) from positive to negative than the SOC arm (12.9±5.6 days). The mean score of Clinical Outcome Ordinal Scale (COOS) was lower in the Homoeopathy arm. Laboratory markers [Interleukins (IL)-6, C-reactive protein (CRP), Neutrophils-Lymphocytes ratio (NLR)]were normalized earlier in Homoeopathy arm. CONCLUSION: Homoeopathy, as add-on therapy with SOC for COVID-19 management, demonstrates a reduction in mortality and morbidity, by reduced requirement of oxygen and hospitalization. Some laboratory markers are normalized at an earlier time. Hence, there is overall control over the disease. Registry: The study was registered on the http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials website under identifier number: CTRI/2020/12/029668 on 9th December 2020.

Efficacy of Arsenicum album 30C in the Prevention of COVID-19 in Individuals Residing in Containment Areas: A Prospective, Multicenter, Cluster-Randomized, Parallel-Arm, Community-Based, Open-Label Study.

OBJECTIVE: During the early part of the COVID-19 pandemic, non-pharmacologic interventions were the strategies for the prevention of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. The Ministry of Ayush, Govt. of India, had advised Arsenicum album 30C as a prophylactic to prevent COVID-19. This study was undertaken to evaluate the protective efficacy and safety of the Arsenicum album 30C. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, cluster-randomized, parallel-arm, community-based, open-label study involving apparently healthy individuals residing in containment areas of 7 cities in India. Clusters are defined as the population residing in the containment areas, who are under restriction for movement. Forty-two clusters were randomly assigned at 2:1 to the Arsenicum album 30C group (30 clusters) or to the control group (12 clusters, which received no specific therapy). The medicine was given twice daily for 7 days. The primary outcome was the incidence of COVID-19, as per the case definition notified by the National Centre for Disease Control, Government of India, during 3-week follow-up period. RESULTS: The analysis included 32,186 individuals residing in 42 clusters (containment areas). A total of 22,693 individuals from 30 clusters received Arsenicum album 30C, and 9,493 individuals from 12 clusters were observed in the control group. The overall protective effect of the Arsenicum album 30C was 80.22% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71.16-86.44; 40 cases per 22,693 [6.04 per 10,000 person-weeks] in the Arsenicum album 30C group vs. 84 cases per 9,493 [29.78 per 10,000 person-weeks] in the control group). The protective effect of the Arsenicum album 30C against laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 was 68.22% (95% [CI], 49.64-80; 32 cases per 22,693 [4.83 per 10,000 person-weeks] in the Arsenicum album 30C group vs. 42 cases per 9,493 [14.93 per 10,000 person-weeks] in the control group). Adverse effects observed in both groups were mild and resolved without medication and sequelae. CONCLUSION: Homeopathic medicine Arsenicum album 30C was associated with a decrease in the incidence and provided some protection against COVID-19 as compared to nontreatment. Further randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials may be conducted to validate the results of this study.In der Anfangszeit der COVID-19-Pandemie setzte man auf nicht-medikamentöse Massnahmen zur Prävention von Infektionen mit SARS-CoV-2 (Schweres-Akutes-Respiratorisches-Syndrom-Coronavirus 2). Das Ayush-Ministerium der indischen Regierung empfahl Arsenicum album 30C als Prophylaxe zur COVID-19-Prävention. Das Ziel dieser Studie war die Beurteilung der Schutzwirkung und Sicherheit von Arsenicum album 30C.An unserer prospektiven, multizentrischen, Cluster-randomisierten, unverblindeten Parallelgruppen-Bevölkerungs-Studie nahmen gesund erscheinende Bewohner von Sperrzonen in sieben indischen Städten teil. Die Cluster waren definiert als die Bewohnerpopulation je einer Sperrzone, für welche Mobilitätsbeschränkungen galten. 42 Cluster wurden per Randomisierung im Verhältnis 2:1 dem Arsenicum-album-30C-Arm (30 Cluster) oder dem Kontrollarm (12 Cluster, die keine spezifische Behandlung erhielten) zugeteilt. Das Medikament wurde sieben Tage lang zweimal täglich angewendet. Die primäre Zielgröße war die COVID-19-Inzidenz laut der vom National Centre for Disease Control der indischen Regierung bekannt gegebenen Falldefinition in einem Nachbeobachtungszeitraum von drei Wochen.Die Analyse umfasste 32.186 Personen in 42 Clustern (Sperrzonen). Insgesamt 22.693 Personen in 30 Clustern erhielten Arsenicum album 30C, und 9.493 Personen in 12 Clustern wurden als Kontrollarm beobachtet. Die Ergebnisse für Alter, Geschlecht und Komorbidität waren im Behandlungs- und Kontrollarm vergleichbar. Die Gesamt-Schutzwirkung von Arsenicum album 30C betrug 80,22 % (95-%-Konfidenzintervall [KI]: 71,16­86,44; 40 Fälle unter 22.693 [6,04 pro 10.000 Personen-Wochen] im Arsenicum-album-30C-Arm vs. 84 Fälle unter 9.493 [29,78 pro 10.000 Personen-Wochen] im Kontrollarm). Die Schutzwirkung von Arsenicum album 30C gegen laboranalytisch bestätigte COVID-19-Erkrankung betrug 68,22 % (95-%-KI: 49,64­80; 32 Fälle unter 22.693 [4,83 pro 10.000 Personen-Wochen] im Arsenicum-album-30C-Arm vs. 42 Fälle unter 9.493 [14,93 pro 10.000 Personen-Wochen] im Kontrollarm). Die beobachteten unerwünschten Wirkungen waren in beiden Gruppen von geringer Schwere und klangen ohne Medikation folgenlos ab.Das Homöopathikum Arsenicum album 30C war im Vergleich zur Nichtbehandlung mit einer Verringerung der Inzidenz assoziiert und bot gewissen Schutz vor COVID-19. Weitere randomisierte, doppelblinde, placebokontrollierte Studien könnten durchgeführt werden, um die Ergebnisse dieser Studie zu validieren.

An Assessment of a Public Health Initiative of Homeopathy for Primary Teething.

BACKGROUND: During primary teething, children suffer from running nose, mild fever, diarrhoea and other mild irritations and inflammations. A public health programme, 'Homoeopathy for the Healthy Child', was undertaken on a pilot basis focusing on promotion of healthy teething by provision of home-based care through six pre-identified homeopathic medicines for complaints commonly observed during primary teething. This article assesses the feasibility of this programme and reports the impact of this initiative on teething profile in children and episodes of diarrhoea and upper respiratory tract infection (URTI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs) were trained in child care and usage of a kit comprising six medicines, namely Calcarea phosphoricum 6X (CP), Ferrum phosphoricum 3X, Magnesium phosphoricum 6X, Belladonna 30C, Chamomilla 30C and Podophyllum 30C. Calcarea phosphoricum was given regularly to each participating child from 6 months to 1 year of age. Home-based care for diarrhoea, URTI and mild fever was provided by ASHAs using the other five medicines in the kit. Dentition pattern and diarrhoea/URTI episodes were recorded over a period of the next 12 months. RESULTS: Eleven thousand four-hundred and twenty-six children were followed up regularly. Amongst those who enrolled at 6-7 months, a larger proportion of children were approaching expected teething in successive months as compared with children enrolled at 12 months, thus indicating that teething delays, if any, were overcome during this period. Incidence of diarrhoea and URTI showed decrease in the months after enrolment. Children responded favourably to the medicines given by ASHAs at the time of diarrhoea/URTI episodes, and ASHAs expressed satisfaction with the programme. CONCLUSION: An approach with regular use of CP and home-based care with homeopathy through health workers for common problems in teething children is acceptable to the community and enhances outreach of services to the public at large. Observations in terms of the healthy teething period may be further validated through studies of homeopathy with suitable comparator group.